Notarial discipline in Costa Rica runs on two structurally separate tracks — judicial and administrative — with two different deadlines that must never be merged. This page shows exactly which articles ground each stage of that process, and why this branch's verification story looks different from our other jurisdiction pages.
The Código Notarial, enacted as Ley N.º 7764, has been in force in Costa Rica since November 22, 1998. It's the primary statute governing the notarial profession — who may hold a notary commission, what a notary's duties and prohibitions are, and, the subject of this page, what happens when a notary is accused of professional misconduct.
What this branch models
Exactly one process: the proceso disciplinario notarial — the disciplinary proceeding brought against a notary. Seven sequential stages, fully mapped below.
What's explicitly out of scope
The day-to-day exercise of fe pública notarial — drafting escrituras, keeping the protocolo, authentication formalities. Real, substantial subject matter, reserved for a future, separate corpus — not blended into disciplinary answers.
An earlier internal draft recorded the Código Notarial's effective date as April 17, 1998 — the date the bill was passed by the Legislative Assembly. The correct date is November 22, 1998 — when the statute actually entered into force per its own transitory provisions. A small error in absolute terms, but exactly the kind of date-precision mistake this verification process exists to catch: "when was this law passed" and "when did it take effect" are different questions.
One honest caveat up front, same as every jurisdiction page on this site: this page describes source grounding — what our system reads, and how carefully we checked it — not legal advice. Every article mapping here still requires review and sign-off by a licensed Costa Rican notary or attorney before it's used as a citable basis for advice to an end user.
Unlike the article-mapping work on our other jurisdiction pages — where an earlier draft had attributed entire chapters to the wrong process and a verification pass had to catch it — this branch's disciplinary chapter (Título VII, arts. 138–165) was read literally, article by article, before the first schema draft was even written, and independently confirmed against SINALEVI. So this branch's most recent revision isn't a "we found the wrong article numbers" story — it's about completing and formalizing an already-accurate map: finishing the verification-confidence vocabulary, adding an explicit track designation to every stage, filling the full article registry, and fixing the in-force date above. Not every branch's revision tells the same kind of story.
| # | Phase | Art. | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Denuncia y competencia | 138, 140, 141, 150–152 | A complaint is filed. The threshold question is jurisdictional — judicial bodies (138, 141) or the DNN's administrative track (140). Art. 150 sets who may file; 152 sets the formal requirements (facts + evidence, may be oral); 151 addresses a compensatory claim joined to the complaint. |
| b | Instrucción | 153–155 | The accused notary receives formal notice and a chance to respond (153); a hearing is convened with a minimum notice period (154); the deciding body must expressly weigh the evidence, including technical proof where damages are alleged (155). |
| c | Sentencia | 139, 143–148, 156 | Closing arguments and judgment (156 sets the procedural clock). Arts. 139 and 143–148 lay out the graduated sanction catalog — from apercibimiento through escalating suspension periods — and the criteria for matching conduct to sanction tier. |
| d | Recursos ordinarios | 157, 158, 163 | Art. 157 allows a general revocatoria and taxatively lists what else may be appealed. Art. 158 addresses cosa juzgada (judicial track only). Art. 163 opens the CPC as a suppletory source — see below. |
| e | Incidentes de nulidad | 163 + CPC | Where a party raises a nullity incident, the CN has no dedicated procedure of its own — it borrows one wholesale from the CPC via the art. 163 suppletory clause. |
| f | Apelación por inadmisión | 157 + CPC | Art. 157 states certain rulings simply lack the ordinary appeal remedy under the CN's own text. Where a party contests an inadmisión ruling anyway, the mechanics again come from the CPC via art. 163. |
| g | Firmeza, edicto y habilitación | 13, 158, 161, 162 | Once final, art. 161 governs publication by edicto (single publication) and notice to the Archivo Notarial, Registro Nacional, Registro Civil, and DNN; suspension begins after a fixed number of calendar days. Art. 162 addresses compensatory guaranty. Art. 13 + Lineamientos 9–10 govern practical suspension effects. |
Cross-cutting every stage: prescription of the disciplinary action runs two years under CN arts. 164–165; the disciplinary tribunals themselves are created and staffed under arts. 169–170.
Track: jurisdiccional
3 días
ordinary appeal deadline — CN art. 157
Track: administrativo_dnn
5 días hábiles
recourse deadline — CN art. 24 bis / Lineamientos art. 102
Our top-line rule for this branch: these two deadlines must never be merged or conflated. A three-day judicial window and a five-business-day administrative window are not two ways of describing the same thing, and a document from one track must never have its deadlines calculated as though it belonged to the other. Every piece of notarial-track content is tagged with which track it belongs to, specifically so any downstream deadline calculation reads the correct clock first.
| CPC art. | What it governs (general, not tied to any specific matter) |
|---|---|
| 5.3 | Preclusión / inadmisión — when a procedural opportunity has lapsed |
| 15 | Saneamiento of procedural defects — curing correctable errors before dismissal on formal grounds |
| 32.1 | Absolute nullity of a procedural act |
| 33.1 | Relative nullity of a procedural act |
| 33.3 | Defective processing giving rise to a relative-nullity claim |
| 65.1 | Recourse against a ruling that denies (doesn't admit) an appeal |
| 67.3 | Which autos (procedural orders) are independently appealable |
| 68 | Procedural steps for processing an appeal once filed |
| 72.1.11 | Actividad judicial defectuosa — defective judicial activity as an independent ground |
The full CPC is ingested at P0 priority for this branch, and retrieval joins the CN stage chunk with its corresponding CPC article chunk whenever a stage's metadata carries a cpc_reference — so a query about an inadmission appeal retrieves both the CN provision saying the ordinary appeal is unavailable and the CPC provision supplying the substitute mechanism.
The DNN publishes its own official Lineamientos for the exercise and control of the notarial service — genuinely authoritative on stage g's post-sanction effects (protocol handover, Lineamientos art. 9; the public disciplinary registry, art. 10) and on administrative-track precautionary measures (arts. 101–102). But the Lineamientos are infralegal — below statute.
If a Lineamientos provision and a statutory provision appear to say different things, the statute controls — a hard rule in our citation ordering, not a judgment call made per query. Separately: LGAP arts. 343 and 346 (3 days for a final administrative act, 24 hours for other acts) apply only to the administrative DNN track and must never be applied to a document from the judicial track.
When an article mapping for this branch is still genuinely unresolved (tagged SINALEVI-PENDING in this branch's own vocabulary), the system does not surface a best-effort guess dressed up as a citation. It returns a distinct PENDING_HUMAN_VERIFY state instead of an article number. No citation is treated as safer than an unverified one.
Everything on this page traces to the Sistema Nacional de Legislación Vigente (SINALEVI), published by Costa Rica's Procuraduría General de la República at pgrweb.go.cr/scij.
| Law | Short name | SCIJ nValor2 | Scope of use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ley 7764 | Código Notarial | 42683 | Primary source — 193 arts., v. 17/17 del 11/09/2025 |
| Ley 9342 | Código Procesal Civil | 81360 | Suppletory source under CN art. 163 |
| Ley 6227 | Ley General de la Administración Pública | 13231 | Administrative DNN track only |
| Ley 8508 | Código Procesal Contencioso-Administrativo | 57436 | Cited only for art. 36 inc. c) — agotamiento before contencioso-administrativo |
Where our other branches use a five-tier scale, this branch maps to a three-tier scheme built specifically around SINALEVI verification status:
Maps from HIGH / SINALEVI_VERIFIED source confidence — confirmed by a direct, article-by-article read of the official consolidated text.
Maps from LOW / MEDIUM confidence — ingested and available, but not yet independently line-read; requires attorney review before user-facing citation.
Triggers the PENDING_HUMAN_VERIFY behavior — no article citation shown to the end user at all.
Nothing on this page has reached attorney sign-off yet. Reaching SINALEVI_VERIFIED on a statutory mapping is a necessary step, not the final one. A licensed Costa Rican notary or attorney reviewing and approving these mappings for citable use is a separate, deliberate gate not yet completed for this branch. If you're a practicing notary or attorney and something here doesn't match your own reading of the consolidated text, we want to hear about it.
Want to see Nammu on a notarial matter?
Request a demo